• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Monday, June 16, 2025
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

City releases email two years late

Debbie Coleman-Topi by Debbie Coleman-Topi
September 25, 2020
in Headlines
Email
25
SHARES
625
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

In it, Parkville official questioned legality of zoning issue

A newly released email exchange reveals that some Parkville city officials questioned the legality of at least one aspect of the massive Creekside development in the zoning process and worried that the matter could lead to legal action “if opponents of the development wish to pursue it.”

The email, finally released as part of a Sunshine request made two years ago by Parkville area resident Jason Maki, shows the head of the planning and zoning board and one member of the board of aldermen questioned if the project, an apartment complex within Creekside, was too dense as zoned in the area proposed.

RelatedNews

Platte City makes offer to man from Arnold, Mo.

New bridge going in on Hwy. Z

Discussion continues on Hwy. 9 proposals in Parkville

Missouri Sunshine Law expert and attorney Mark Pedroli said in a telephone interview Monday afternoon that the thread could become part of Maki’s open records lawsuit against the City of Parkville.

The email is Sunshine-worthy because Jason Maki, the citizen who is suing the city, submitted his requests for communications between city officials about the development before the board of aldermen approved the plans for the massive development.

Pedroli said if officials had released the email when it was originally requested, the information could have impacted the development, even delaying or preventing construction and the public “would have known more about it (the project).”

The release of such governmental communications is at the heart of the Sunshine Law, which is aimed at government transparency.

Maki said he submitted Sunshine requests for such communications between city officials in September and October two years ago, just prior to the board of aldermen’s approval of Creekside. The more than 350-acre residential, retail, and light industrial development currently is under construction near Interstate 435 and Missouri 45.

An email and phone call to City Administrator Joe Parente, asking why the email was finally released two years after it was requested, were not answered.

Maki told The Landmark that “the city’s disclosure of this email is roughly two years too late. Knowledge of the concerns raised by (planning and zoning chairman) Mr. Dean Katerndahl would have provided critical and timely information to the public regarding Creekside, the apparent legality of its approval process, and [would have] raised important questions about approving the tens of millions in tax incentives. Unfortunately, the public has been deprived of this knowledge until just now.”

Alderman Philip Wassmer forwarded Katerndahl’s email, dated Oct. 31, 2018 to Mayor Nan Johnston. In his forwarded email, he wrote: “I feel like we really let P&Z down last night by not either accepting the city recommendation of less density OR redirecting the developer to re-apply for an R-5. I know a good portion of commissioners are feeling like their efforts don’t matter today.”

In his email to Wassmer, Katerndahl questioned if the project was properly zoned according to the city’s classifications that regulate multi-family residential properties.

“I have one major dispute.” Katerndahl wrote. “I totally disagree with Stephen’s (Community Development Director Stephen Lachky’s) interpretation of how R-4 standards are being applied,” he wrote. “Basically we are saying any current R-4 district can pick and choose whether to follow the old standards or the new ones,” he wrote, referring to an earlier city designation governing the density of residential properties.

During a telephone interview Monday afternoon, Katerndahl opened his conversation with a Landmark reporter by asking, “You mean The Landmark has nothing better to do than to dig up old news?”

City officials revised the zoning standards about five years ago, he said during the telephone interview. But his email caught in the Sunshine request clarifies that officials were told at the time that “new standards would apply once the new code was adopted.”

The directives came from the city’s attorney and a consultant who advised officials about changing the zoning designations. Katerndahl’s email stated that he was concerned “respectfully, as a citizen of the old town, asking for a legal interpretation on the applicability of the R-4 standards to R-4 property in the old town residential area.”

Katerndahl wrote in his 2018 email that he was concerned that “we have not provided the old town with the protections of the new standards residents of the area were promised.”

But during Monday’s telephone interview, Katerndahl explained the city’s use of old density regulations, stating they were “grandfathered in” and were therefore legal to be used in this case. But his email does not mention anything about “grandfathering” and instead reflects concern. “That was not the intent when the changes were adopted a couple of years ago,” his 2018 email states. “I believe the Creekside developer (Brian Mertz of Parkville Development) should have asked for R-5 designation for the apartment portion of the development,” he wrote. “This could be a legal liability for the city if opponents of the development wish to pursue it.”

In clarifying his concerns, Katerndahl ended that email by writing: “As you can see, since I am sending this email while the Board of Aldermen’s meeting is still going on, I take this matter extremely seriously. I look forward to receiving your reply.”

This week in a telephone interview, Katerndahl continued to downplay the impact of density of Creekside, stating it’s more about aesthetics and “amenities,” including landscaping, walking trails and the building’s appearance, including architectural features.

“This was a big, complex project with lots of different elements the review process went over several months,” he said. “We felt, in the end, we got a pretty good project.”

Maki reacted to Katerndahl’s comments this week by saying: “Mr. Katerndahl is side-stepping the important question he raised during the passage of Creekside.”

“To the best of my knowledge the approved R-4 zoning for Creekside has not changed to R-5; a quick review of Parkville’s 2020 zoning map seems to confirm it,” Maki said this week.

Maki added: “So, the legal question becomes did the City of Parkville follow the law during the passage of Creekside and its related tax incentives; and has the withholding from the public of the legal concerns expressed by the head of the city’s planning and zoning for nearly two years created another Sunshine Law problem for Parkville?”

Maki declined to comment about whether the information in this newly-released email will play a role in his lawsuit.

Zoning board members get frustrated then backtrack

Tags: Dean KaterndahlLawsuitsNan JohnstonparkvillePhilip Wassmerplatte countySunshine Lawstax incentivestaxes
Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie’s journalism career officially began at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, where she was trained. Her works have appeared in the Kansas City Star and its former Sunday Magazine, the Independence Examiner and TWINS Magazine. Since 2016, Debbie has written for The Landmark, where she has reported on a wide range of Platte County area issues and people.

Related Posts

Bryan Richison

Platte City makes offer to man from Arnold, Mo.

by Ivan Foley
June 13, 2025
0

BRYAN RICHISON MAY BECOME NEW CITY ADMINISTRATOR Matthew Bryan Richison has been offered the position as the new city administrator for Platte City. The Platte City Board of Aldermen is holding a special closed session today (Friday) at 4:30 to...

45 Years Ago–June 6, 1980

by Ivan Foley
June 12, 2025
0

Paul Regan, manager of Ferrelgas of Platte City, Bethel Road, is the new fire chief for the Platte City volunteer fire department. His selection by the other members of the fire department was approved by the Platte City Board of...

30 Years Ago–June 15, 1995

by Ivan Foley
June 12, 2025
0

Platte County Commission plans to build a new bridge across Jowler Creek on Interurban Road just south of Camden Point have hit a snag because the existing bridge has been declared of “historical significance,” it was announced Thursday. Platte County...

15 Years Ago–June 16, 2010

by Ivan Foley
June 12, 2025
0

City of Parkville officials on Monday warned of high water in English Landing Park and changes for the upcoming River Jam event that may be caused by it. As of 12:30 p.m. Monday, water levels had reached 27.25 feet, flooding...

Next Post
CARES Act

Eight additional CARES grants given by county

Popular News

  • Bryan Richison

    Platte City makes offer to man from Arnold, Mo.

    40 shares
    Share 16 Tweet 10
  • Detectives speaking with ‘person of interest’ in shooting death of sports reporter

    64 shares
    Share 26 Tweet 16
  • I-29 pedestrian struck by three vehicles dies at scene

    73 shares
    Share 29 Tweet 18
  • KC man charged in shooting death of local sports reporter

    34 shares
    Share 14 Tweet 9
  • Input sought for Downtown Platte City

    10 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 3
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe Online
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved