• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Saturday, May 10, 2025
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

Opposing two tax increases on Nov. 5

Landmark Digital by Landmark Digital
October 4, 2024
in Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
33
SHARES
834
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

EDITOR:

On the Nov. 5 election ballot, there will be two questions with vague wording that will be forever taxes in Platte County.

RelatedNews

Something is wrong in Park Hill School District

Sam, it was Biden’s work, not Trump’s

Voters, how do we make you care?

If passed, the Metropolitan Community College-Kansas City will annex the Platte County R-3 School District and raise our taxes accordingly. The second question concerns local charitable organizations asking to receive tax-payer funding for what they call “children services.”

The question proposed by this junior college intends to offer reduced tuition rates by raising our property and real estate taxes. A state statute gives them sole authority to do this if the voters approve. These taxes are raised by adding an additional tax levy of $0.1780 assessed value per $100. For example, if your home is appraised at $250,000, you will pay an additional $85 per year.

I assume the tax will benefit a small number of students going to this local college. But for most taxpayers, like seniors or those who have selected other colleges for their children, there is no benefit for Platte County property holders to subsidize this junior college.

Finally, you might remember in April 2021 that Platte County taxpayers defeated this same ballot question. I guess this is a second bite at the apple.

The second question intends to increase the sales tax rate in Platte County by a quarter cent. This question is using child well-being and child safety as ways to elicit public support for a new forever tax. Of course, if you oppose this, you will be demonized. But I can only imagine several of the ways this funding could be applied that would violate many of our conservative principles.

Why can’t our local non-profits and county organizations like: Hillcrest Transition Housing, Synergy Services, Platte County Health Department, county public schools, Parkville Women’s Clinic, Beacon Mental Health, etc., use contributions and current taxes to accomplish these goals? Most already do.

If child well-being is a concern for anyone, contribute to them voluntarily. Why must this be mandated for seniors, people with no children, and people with grown children in these hard economic times?

I strongly recommend a NO vote on both questions. We do not need higher taxes in this time of economic inflation driven by progressive spending policies, strangling regulations, and failed governance.

                    --Mike Stark
                       Platte City   
Tags: electionsHealth Departmentparkvilleplatte cityplatte countytaxes
Landmark Digital

Landmark Digital

Related Posts

45 Years Ago–May 2, 1980

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Mr. and Mrs. Don R. Bailey of Independence announce the upcoming marriage of their daughter, Cathy Jean, to James Franklin Anderson, son of Lt. Col and Mrs. F.B. Anderson of Ferrelview. The ceremony will commence Saturday, May 24 at the...

30 Years Ago–May 4, 1995

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Between the Lines by Ivan Foley: Major League Baseball is back after the strike, but fans across the country thus far have given it a cool reception. In Kansas City, the Royals couldn’t even give away all 5,000 of the...

15 Years Ago–May 5, 2010

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

If you thought the proposed Tomahawke housing development had disappeared from the news cycle, think again. Chris Byrd, attorney for landowners/developers Hal and Peggy Swaney, told The Landmark on Tuesday that the developers will be filing to appeal a judge’s...

Back to the movies

Catechism, burglary vs. robbery, The Accountant 2

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Guy Speckman, our Ponder the Thought columnist on page 3, has inspiring, amusing and educational thoughts on Catholicism and whatnot in his column this week, including a detailed explanation of how a new Pope is chosen. I want to say...

Next Post
Kansas City Chiefs

Heaven, Gracie Hunt, freak offs

Popular News

  • Northland Workforce Development Center

    KC commits $25 million to new workforce center

    19 shares
    Share 8 Tweet 5
  • Five businesses hit in series of break-ins

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Sheriff’s department provides statement on officer-involved shooting

    22 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • The Landmark begins its 161st year of publication

    7 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 2
  • Catechism, burglary vs. robbery, The Accountant 2

    6 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 2
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe Online
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved