• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Login / Sign-up
    • Results by Week
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Login / Sign-up
    • Results by Week
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

Judge orders city to respond to requests for discovery

Debbie Coleman-Topi by Debbie Coleman-Topi
February 19, 2021
in Headlines
12
SHARES
309
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

Latest in the Sunshine lawsuit vs. Parkville

On a recent motion to compel in a lawsuit against Parkville, a Platte County judge sided in favor of Jason Maki, a citizen who is suing the City of Parkville for alleged violations of the state’s Sunshine Law.

If Maki is successful in his lawsuit, the City of Parkville could be fined in excess of $300,000, not including any legal fees awarded to Maki by the court.

RelatedNews

‘I’m proud of making a difference’

The Landmark enters 158th year of publication

City extends lease on temporary police station

Parkville’s legal costs in this matter have already surpassed $100,000.

Judge James Van Amburg ordered that the City of Parkville to fully respond to multiple discovery requests filed by Maki. Maki had previously asked the court to order the city to answer his questions after the city refused to answer his requests for discovery.

Parkville’s team of attorneys objected on several grounds, including that Maki’s questions were unduly burdensome. However, in a ruling dated Feb. 9, the judge overruled the city’s arguments and gave the City of Parkville 10 days, or until Friday, Feb. 19, to provide Maki the requested information.

During the case, Maki has maintained that the city and its team of lawyers have failed to provide him information he has requested despite a judge ordering the information’s release during a hearing this past August.

In one hearing, Judge Van Amburg told Steve Coronado, one of the city-hired attorneys, that Maki “is entitled to that information and I want it provided to him.” Coronado stated he would respond to items requested “to the extent that we have the information on it.”

Van Amburg said Maki should be apprised of the processes that city officials have used to respond to his Sunshine requests. Specifically, those processes include search terms used, amounts charged and how fees were calculated. During that hearing, Coronado again replied “understood,” but according to court documents the information was never provided.

City’s Responses to Date Have Been Evasive

One of Maki’s Sunshine requests asked for communications between city officials and members of the press. His lawsuit claims that the city withheld hundreds of the communications sought from the public. In the court documents, the city responded that a “technical error of some type” led to the documents being withheld from Maki.

Maki has since requested that the city “describe in detail” the city’s alleged “technical error of some type.” Attorneys for the city objected to answering Maki’s request as they feel it is “vague, ambiguous and argumentative” and would require speculation, “as to facts being sought…”

The judge agreed with Maki’s assessment that the city’s descriptions of the technical error that led to information being withheld was “incomplete or evasive” and has ordered the city to answer Maki’s question.

In other information requested, Maki asked the city to describe the process the city uses in maintaining the identities of property and their owners including the methods by which the city determines where to send sewer bills.

The city’s response was: “The city doesn’t maintain a list.”

The city’s legal team also objected to Maki’s question as being “broad and unduly burdensome” and that it would require “a narrative response” that would require the defendant to “guess and to speculate” regarding the information being sought. Maki responded that “interrogatories naturally seek some narrative form response,” and that the city is not overly burdened by providing such information.

The final interrogatory to which the city’s legal defense objected, asks for the city to identify anyone that the city officials or staff have “discussed” topics “concerning” Maki’s records requests. The interrogatory specifically requests the city to identify members and officers of boards, commissions, political subdivisions, and quasi-governmental groups, including members of Community Improvement Districts (CIDs) with whom Maki’s requests were “discussed.”

The city’s attorneys claimed that the words “concerning” and “discussed” are overly broad and require speculation “as to their meaning” and that Maki’s question “seeks information not relevant to this case (and) not likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

Maki responded by stating that the terms are commonly used in the English language, are not overly broad, and “do not require the city to speculate.”

In summation, Maki’s court filing stated, that the City of Parkville has evaded “its duty to make legal records available to Mr. Maki that he requested under the Sunshine Law” and by refusing to answer the questions “is acting evasively, demonstrating conscious and intentional disregard for the discovery process and the court’s prior rulings in the case.”

The filing continues that “the city’s blanket, boilerplate, and nonspecific objections are unfounded and do not apply to Mr. Maki’s interrogatories.”

The latest court hearing in the case was Jan. 25, and another was scheduled for Monday, Feb. 8, but was canceled, presumably due to weather. Another date has not yet been set.

Tags: Lawsuitsparkvilleplatte countySunshine Laws
Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie’s journalism career officially began at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, where she was trained. Her works have appeared in the Kansas City Star and its former Sunday Magazine, the Independence Examiner and TWINS Magazine. Since 2016, Debbie has written for The Landmark, where she has reported on a wide range of Platte County area issues and people.

Related Posts

45 Years Ago–May 13, 1977

by Ivan Foley
May 13, 2022
0

Dr. Carl Myers purchase the Platte Medical Clinic in Platte City this week and plans to open his office here in the near future. Dr. Nourbaksh will continue to be located in the Platte Medical Clinic. Mr. and Mrs. Louis...

30 Years Ago–May 15, 1992

by Ivan Foley
May 13, 2022
0

Bob Foster, vice principal of Fort Osage Junior High in northeast Independence, has been hired as principal at West Platte High School in Weston. Two girls tied with the same grade point average have been declared valedictorians of the class...

15 Years Ago–May 9, 2007

by Ivan Foley
May 13, 2022
0

It has been a hectic week for Platte County residents and business owners with property in low-lying areas, as heavy rains across the region have forced rivers and streams out of their banks. Areas in and around Parkville, Riverside, Tracy...

The 80's

Kim Carnes and never buy gas on Tuesdays

by Ivan Foley
May 13, 2022
0

Gonna hit you with some pop culture stuff this week. Just because I want to. Season four of Ozark on Netflix. Have you finished it yet? Let's get through this without spoiling it for those who haven't made it all...

Next Post
Pitchers and catchers

Pitchers and catchers report

Popular News

  • Area distillery releases first new bourbon in 30 years

    Area distillery releases first new bourbon in 30 years

    22 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • Bee Creek Bridge replacement set

    10 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 3
  • Large logistics park planned east of I-29

    198 shares
    Share 79 Tweet 50
  • Memorial Day Weekend Celebration planned

    7 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 2
  • City extends lease on temporary police station

    7 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 2
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe Online
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem
    • Results by Week
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?