• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Sunday, March 7, 2021
46 °f
Platte
62 ° Tue
66 ° Wed
53 ° Thu
46 ° Fri
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

Suit alleges Starbucks uses ‘bait and switch’

Valerie Verkamp by Valerie Verkamp
February 28, 2020
in Local News
7
SHARES
172
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

Starbucks has been hit with a proposed class action lawsuit that alleges the top coffee shop engages in false and deceptive advertising practices to “cheat consumers” into believing the amounts of espresso and caffeine vary in some of its Grande and Venti-sized beverages.

Starbucks Corporation is an American coffee company and coffeehouse chain. Starbucks was founded in Seattle, Wash. in 1971. The company now operates approximately 30,000 locations worldwide.

RelatedNews

Around 1,700 shots to be offered in the next week

Republican women to meet via Zoom

Contractor chosen for new Buck O’Neil Bridge

According to the 19-page complaint filed in the Central District of California, Starbucks uses a “classic bait-and-switch scheme” that leads consumers to believe they’ll be getting more espresso and caffeine if they purchase the larger size beverage at a higher cost. “However, in reality, consumers receive a more expensive, Venti-sized drink containing the same amount of espresso and caffeine as the cheaper Grande-sized equivalent drink,” the suit says.

Starbucks offers a variety of hot and cold beverages in four drink sizes: Short (8 fl. oz.), Tall (12 fl. oz.), Grande (16. fl. oz.), and Venti (20 fl. oz.) The lawsuit argues consumers have come to expect that if the drinks increase in size then so would the amount of coffee or espresso. At Starbucks a customer ordering a Grande beverage will receive more espresso and caffeine than they would in a Tall beverage, the suit says. But that same proportional increase does not occur between some of the Grande and Venti sized hot beverages, the suit claims.

Customers purchasing the larger drink size are spending more money for 4 more ounces of milk served with no additional espresso and caffeine. The lawsuit list 18 beverages have the same caffeine or espresso content regardless of whether the customer orders a Grande and Venti size.

“This defies a reasonable consumer’s expectation that if they pay for a larger espresso beverage, they will receive a beverage with more espresso,” the suit says. According to the lawsuit, the amounts of espresso and caffeine do not change whether a customer orders a Grande-size or Venti-size product in the following beverages:

Cappucino, Caramel Cloud Macchiato, Caffe Latte, Pumpkin Spice Latte, Cinnamon Dolce Latte, Cocoa Cloud Macchiato, Flat White, Latte Macchiato, Starbucks Blonde Caffe Latte, Starbucks Blonde Caramel Cloud Macchiato, Starbucks Blonde Flat White, Starbucks Blonde Pumpkin Spice Latte, Starbucks Blonde Vanilla Bean Coconutmilk Latte, Starbucks Blonde Vannilla Latte, Vanilla Bean Coconut Milk Latte, White Chocolate Mocha, and Pumpkin Spice Latte

Leaving Customers in the dark Teresa Adams of Orange County, California purchased a Venti Pumpkin Spice Latte from a Starbucks on November 20, 2019. She paid $5.45 for the Venti size beverage expecting the larger drink size to contain more caffeine. The woman claims neither the menu inside nor the drive-thru provided customers with an “accurate espresso or caffeine content” for the beverage products. The suit claims Adams shelled out more money for a “watered-down version” of a Pumpkin Spice Latte and had she been made aware of the truth she would have went with the Grande sized drink.

“At no time does Starbucks inform, or make any effort to inform, consumers as to the true espresso composition or caffeine content of its Venti-sized espresso beverages,” the suit added.

The suit knowledges that Starbucks gives customers the option of adding an additional “shot” of espresso to their drink, but it comes at an additional cost, thus “further reinforcing the reasonable belief that Venti sized products contain more espresso/caffeine than their Grande-sized equivalents,” states the proposed class action suit.

When it comes to the coffee giant’s iced version of most beverages, the espresso or caffeine content does increase between the Grande and Venti sized beverages, states the suit. Perhaps only further leading customers to expect an increase in espresso and caffeine content in Venti-sized hot beverage products.

Advertisements Starbucks, the suit says, continues to engage in “affirmative misrepresentations and material omissions, designed to mislead its consumers into believing that the products contain more espresso and thus caffeine than their Grande-sized equivalents.” As the lawsuit tells it, customers relied on Starbucks alleged “false and deceptive” advertising and paid more for a “product that was not what Starbucks represented.”

The proposed class action lawsuit now asks the court to look into whether Starbuck’s in store signage of sizes and prices is misleading and deceptive.

Only on the company’s website, the suit says, can customers view nutrition information for the various drink sizes. A tall cappuccino, for example, shows the hot beverage, consisting of 2% milk and brewed espresso, contains one shot of espresso and 75 mg of caffeine. When a customer selects a Grande cappuccino, the site shows the drink will contain 2 shots of espresso and 150 mg of caffeine.

However, the amount of espresso and caffeine remains the exact same for the Venti cappuccino.

Tags: Lawsuits
Valerie Verkamp

Valerie Verkamp

Valerie decided she wanted to be a newspaper reporter when she was 28 years old and she successfully convinced the editor of the Platte County Landmark to give it 30 days. It was a unique period of her life when she exuded confidence while fearing she missed her calling after stints as a waitress, bank teller, hotelier, and educator.

Over nearly a decade she has written countless stories on local government, education, lawsuits, community news, crime, and the prison system.

Valerie hails from Park University with a BA in Elementary Education and a post-baccalaureate degree in paralegal studies from Penn Valley Community College. She has received honorable mention for Best Government News Story and joined her Landmark colleagues as recipient of the General Excellence Award in the Better Newspaper Contest sponsored by the Missouri Press Association.

Related Posts

Platte Landing boat ramp described as ‘dangerous’

Platte Landing boat ramp described as ‘dangerous’

by Ivan Foley
March 4, 2021
0

In January of 2017 it is alleged Toni Anderson, age 20, a college student from Wichita who had been living and working in Kansas City, was driving her car when she got disoriented and ended up in the Platte Landing...

Investigations

Investigations, rolling outages and building south

by Ivan Foley
February 26, 2021
0

I'm already regretting taking part in that new drinking game, downing a shot every time a state investigation is opened at Parkville. Need to get my liver drained. We should create and market City of Parkville investigatory scorecards. Let's keep...

Sunshine Law

Attorney general probing Parkville on Sunshine

by Debbie Coleman-Topi
February 26, 2021
0

State office opens review after complaint The office of the Missouri Attorney General has once again opened an investigation into the City of Parkville based on a citizen complaint about officials failing to provide information under the Sunshine Law. The...

City ‘finds’ 2,300 records, gives them to Jason Maki

City ‘finds’ 2,300 records, gives them to Jason Maki

by Debbie Coleman-Topi
February 26, 2021
0

Parkville blames it on 'copying error' Parkville city officials notified an area resident who is suing the city for not releasing information under the Sunshine Law that they have discovered about 2,300 records that were inadvertently never released due to...

Next Post
Keep calm and wash your hands

There's a credibility issue in the air

Popular News

  • Platte Landing boat ramp described as ‘dangerous’

    Platte Landing boat ramp described as ‘dangerous’

    102 shares
    Share 41 Tweet 26
  • Why the urgency for R-3 bond issue?

    30 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 8
  • Judge tells city to produce documents

    23 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • County commissioner wants to be associate circuit judge

    16 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Volunteer coordinator to aid local vaccination clinics

    9 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 2
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Subscribe Online
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist