• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Friday, May 9, 2025
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

Fricker’s comments put county at risk

Ivan Foley by Ivan Foley
August 29, 2024
in Headlines
Legal system
29
SHARES
734
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

ATTORNEYS: COUNTY ‘VICARIOUSLY LIABLE’ FOR HIS CONDUCT

A public document obtained by The Landmark shows that attorneys for Jason Maki, a Platte County resident who made a Sunshine request dealing with the Platte County Commission’s recent $84,000 public education campaign for a proposed jail tax, alleges Presiding Commissioner Scott Fricker made defamatory posts about Maki on Facebook.

RelatedNews

The REAL ID deadline is May 7, you’ll need one to fly

KC commits $25 million to new workforce center

Five businesses hit in series of break-ins

Attorneys with the law firm Fagan and Emert LLC of Lawrence, Kan., sent a certified letter dated Aug. 1 to Platte County Commissioners Scott Fricker, Dagmar Wood and Joe Vanover. The topic of the letter was listed as regarding “County Commissioner Scott Fricker Defamatory Facebook Posts.” The Landmark obtained the letter this week after submitting multiple Sunshine requests to the county for any communication from Maki or his representatives.

Maki, a resident of southern Platte County, is the man who pursued a Sunshine Law case against the City of Parkville a few years ago. The city eventually settled the two-year court case by paying $195,000 to Maki, which legal observers reported to be the largest Sunshine settlement in Missouri history.

On July 22 of this year, Maki filed a Sunshine request with Platte County asking for all electronic records of communication to or from commissioners Scott Fricker, Dagmar Wood, Joe Vanover, county administrator Wes Minder or any other official, employee, or agent of Platte County that has been involved in what the county commission calls “public education” of the jail tax proposal. Maki’s request was reported in a story in the July 24 edition of The Landmark.
Maki’s attorneys point out that on July 27, Fricker “published the following defamatory statements regarding Mr. Maki:”

•“Jason Maki is a scammer, not a ‘sunshine law advocate.’ His sunshine request to the county will cost taxpayers thousands of dollars in staff and legal time to fulfill his ridiculous request.”

•“His goal in this scam is to get the county to pay him off. He scammed the city of Parkville out of $195k (in taxpayer) money and he’s hoping for another payout from the county. He’s not looking out for your interests, he’s trying to make some money. This is a SCAM.”

•“Hey Maki, pound sand.”

•“The county will provide all requested documents and Scammer Maki will find nothing. Huge waste of time and money.”

•“[. . .] you pretend to be an altruistic ‘sunshine law advocate’ but you’re really just looking for another payout. Unless of course you gave the $195k that you got from Parkville to charity. In which case I will publicly apologize.”

The law firm of Fagan and Emert wrote to the commissioners:

“These statements are false. Mr. Maki did not scam the City of Parkville out of anything. Had there been no merit to his claims related to violations of Missouri law, the City of Parkville would not have paid him such a substantial sum. Mr. Maki made valid claims that he was able to prove were true and demonstrated the city had violated Missouri law. He dedicated substantial time and money to the prosecution of that lawsuit to hold the City of Parkville accountable, and a monetary settlement is how the Missouri legislature has decided to compensate those citizens who take the time and incur the expense of taking action to enforce the laws of this state. This is how government oversight by citizens works. Mr. Fricker may consider this offensive, but citizens like Mr. Maki check government power. It seems that Mr. Fricker would prefer to avoid such checks.”

Maki’s attorneys go on to say “the defamatory comments at issue were made in direct reaction to Mr. Maki’s protestations regarding Platte County’s use of taxpayer funds to advocate for and support a ballot measure in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat.115.646. This apparent effort to discourage Mr. Maki’s investigation and the prosecution of his complaint on this election law issue motivated the defamatory remarks.”

The attorneys continue: “Notably, Mr. Fricker published these comments in his official capacity, on his Facebook profile ‘Scott Fricker, Platte County Presiding Commissioner.’ Because Mr. Fricker has since deleted his post, we have included a copy for your reference. Mr. Fricker is using his public position and related platform to bully a citizen in response to raising questions about the county’s compliance with Missouri law. Given his conduct is in his official capacity, the county is vicariously liable for his conduct.”

The letter to commissioners goes on to say: “These statements clearly have defamatory meaning and are damaging to Mr. Maki’s reputation in the community, where he earns income through consultancy work and where his reputation is of prime importance.

“The purpose of this correspondence is to demand that the commission and Mr. Fricker issue a public retraction of the statements previously made, both on the county and Mr. Fricker’s County Commissioner Facebook Pages, as well as in the Platte County Landmark,” the law firm wrote in the certified letter.

The letter goes on to say that if further defamatory remarks are published “we will seek injunctive relief and damages.”

“Notably, given the apparent motivation for Mr. Fricker’s defamatory remarks, we believe that the conduct is sufficient to give rise to liability for punitive damages. Any lawsuit necessary to enforce Mr. Maki’s rights to be free from defamatory publications will seek those damages, and ask the jury to hold Mr. Fricker, and any other defendant who makes similar statements for the same purpose, personally and professionally accountable for them.”

The Landmark reached out to Fricker to offer him the opportunity to comment on the letter from Maki’s attorneys and the demand mentioned within it. He did not respond.

No retraction has yet appeared on either Fricker’s presiding commissioner Facebook page nor the county’s Facebook page.

The Landmark reached Maki for any comments on the situation.

“Mr. Fricker’s actions speak for themselves,” Maki said

RELATED CONTENT:

Did his recruiters give Fricker a personality assessment?
Tags: dagmar woodelectionsLawsuitsparkvilleplatte countySunshine Lawstaxes
Ivan Foley

Ivan Foley

Ivan Foley, longtime owner/publisher of the Platte County Landmark, is a past winner of the national Gish Award for courage, tenacity and integrity in rural journalism, presented by the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues at the University of Kentucky. He lives in Platte County not far from KCI Airport.

Related Posts

45 Years Ago–May 2, 1980

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Mr. and Mrs. Don R. Bailey of Independence announce the upcoming marriage of their daughter, Cathy Jean, to James Franklin Anderson, son of Lt. Col and Mrs. F.B. Anderson of Ferrelview. The ceremony will commence Saturday, May 24 at the...

30 Years Ago–May 4, 1995

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Between the Lines by Ivan Foley: Major League Baseball is back after the strike, but fans across the country thus far have given it a cool reception. In Kansas City, the Royals couldn’t even give away all 5,000 of the...

15 Years Ago–May 5, 2010

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

If you thought the proposed Tomahawke housing development had disappeared from the news cycle, think again. Chris Byrd, attorney for landowners/developers Hal and Peggy Swaney, told The Landmark on Tuesday that the developers will be filing to appeal a judge’s...

Back to the movies

Catechism, burglary vs. robbery, The Accountant 2

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Guy Speckman, our Ponder the Thought columnist on page 3, has inspiring, amusing and educational thoughts on Catholicism and whatnot in his column this week, including a detailed explanation of how a new Pope is chosen. I want to say...

Next Post
Scott Fricker

Did his recruiters give Fricker a personality assessment?

Popular News

  • Northland Workforce Development Center

    KC commits $25 million to new workforce center

    18 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 5
  • Five businesses hit in series of break-ins

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Sheriff’s department provides statement on officer-involved shooting

    22 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • The Landmark begins its 161st year of publication

    6 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 2
  • Catechism, burglary vs. robbery, The Accountant 2

    6 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 2
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe Online
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved