• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Friday, May 9, 2025
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

Health department’s real estate deal

Landmark Staff by Landmark Staff
February 11, 2023
in Letters to the Editor
Platte County Health Department new building

This building at 7925 NW 110th St. in Kansas City is the future home of the Platte County Health Department. Ivan Foley/Landmark photo

4
SHARES
106
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

EDITOR:

The issue before the commission today is whether or not to execute a warranty deed, granting to the health department ownership of the Platte City office building that they’ve been using since 1960. The health department is in contract to sell the building, but it turns out the building is actually owned by the county. The health department is an important member of the community, so normally I wouldn’t have an issue with this. But here’s the problem.

RelatedNews

Something is wrong in Park Hill School District

Sam, it was Biden’s work, not Trump’s

Voters, how do we make you care?

In mid-April 2020, during the height of a global pandemic, the health department started speculating on commercial real estate. Despite already owning two buildings, they decided to purchase a third building. According to the Platte County Landmark, the purchase price was $1.9 million and they used existing reserve funds for the purchase. What’s worse, they did this before selling, or even having contracts on their other two buildings.

And now, nearly three years after purchasing that third property, as they prepare to close on the sale of the Platte City property, the proceeds of which I’m sure are required to finance the new property, they discover that the county owns that building. What if it was owned by a private party, not interested in giving it back to the health department? Without that deed, this speculative real estate deal is in deep trouble. Complex commercial real estate deals like this are risky. Many things could, and still might, go wrong.

Think about it. This is the taxpayer-funded county health department in the middle of a devastating global panic. And yet here they are, making real estate deals they didn’t have to make. They purchased an office property at the height of a very hot real estate market, and just assumed that they could sell their other two properties whenever they wanted. As we now know, the office market tanked, of course, and the health department is now forced to sell two properties in a far worse real estate market than when they started this deal in 2020.

After the health department purchased their new property, at least partially with cash reserves that would be needed to serve the public during this pandemic, they compounded their mistakes by spending tens of thousands of dollars or more on improvements – all for a space they still don’t occupy. So what did they do to help offset this self-inflicted cash crunch? They lobbied for and received from the county commission CARES Act funds that could have instead gone to small business owners who were devastated by the restrictions placed on them, ironically, by the health department.

Despite my concerns, I initially had decided to support this. But I cannot in good conscience agree to give that property to the health department without first getting some answers. I want the health department to open their books and their meeting minutes, and show us how and why this deal was put together from the very start. I’d like to know who advised them, and who made the decisions. How do current numbers compare to original projections?

I hope I’m wrong, and will gladly admit it if I am. But in the meantime and until I get some answers, I’ll be voting no on this issue.

             --Scott Fricker
               Platte County
              Presiding Commissioner
Tags: Health Departmentplatte cityplatte county
Landmark Staff

Landmark Staff

Related Posts

45 Years Ago–May 2, 1980

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Mr. and Mrs. Don R. Bailey of Independence announce the upcoming marriage of their daughter, Cathy Jean, to James Franklin Anderson, son of Lt. Col and Mrs. F.B. Anderson of Ferrelview. The ceremony will commence Saturday, May 24 at the...

30 Years Ago–May 4, 1995

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Between the Lines by Ivan Foley: Major League Baseball is back after the strike, but fans across the country thus far have given it a cool reception. In Kansas City, the Royals couldn’t even give away all 5,000 of the...

15 Years Ago–May 5, 2010

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

If you thought the proposed Tomahawke housing development had disappeared from the news cycle, think again. Chris Byrd, attorney for landowners/developers Hal and Peggy Swaney, told The Landmark on Tuesday that the developers will be filing to appeal a judge’s...

Back to the movies

Catechism, burglary vs. robbery, The Accountant 2

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Guy Speckman, our Ponder the Thought columnist on page 3, has inspiring, amusing and educational thoughts on Catholicism and whatnot in his column this week, including a detailed explanation of how a new Pope is chosen. I want to say...

Next Post
Government touches lives in beneficial ways

Good government?

Popular News

  • Northland Workforce Development Center

    KC commits $25 million to new workforce center

    18 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 5
  • Five businesses hit in series of break-ins

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Sheriff’s department provides statement on officer-involved shooting

    22 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • The Landmark begins its 161st year of publication

    6 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 2
  • Catechism, burglary vs. robbery, The Accountant 2

    6 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 2
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe Online
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved