• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Thursday, July 7, 2022
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Login / Sign-up
    • Results by Week
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Login / Sign-up
    • Results by Week
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

Maki wanted to protect clerk from being ‘fall guy’

Debbie Coleman-Topi by Debbie Coleman-Topi
August 13, 2021
in Headlines
Jason Maki

Jason Maki

25
SHARES
623
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

Resident: ‘If anybody believes this is done, they’re mistaken’

A record-setting settlement in a Sunshine Law lawsuit in Platte County continued to be a bit contentious even after both the resident who filed the suit and the defendants, Parkville city officials, signed the settlement agreement.

In the civil case, Jason Maki, a Parkville area resident and non-attorney who represented himself in the case, alleged 59 violations of the state’s open records and meetings law, which was written to foster government transparency.

RelatedNews

Persons of interest still at large

Fireworks display in Platte City

Downtown Platte City free festival set July 4th

According to Maki the city’s press release announcing the settlement misstated the facts of the settlement and was misleading to the public. “The city’s press release takes advantage of and evades the spirit of a clause designed to protect Miss Chesney,” Maki said. “I was concerned McChesney (Melissa McChesney, Parkville’s city clerk) would become the ‘fall guy’ for the conduct and decision making of Parkville’s elected officials,” he said.

Maki also stated that he felt he needed to act to ensure that the city acknowledge that McChesney “did her job” as instructed as to avoid any risk of her losing her job as Parkville’s clerk and custodian of records. After all, Maki said, McChesney was simply following orders from her superiors at City Hall.

Maki said a clause, inserted into the settlement at his request, was meant to ensure that the city clerk not be held responsible for the city’s failure to release documents. City clerks are “custodians of record” in Sunshine requests, meaning they are tasked with responding to requests for information and releasing documents.

Maki said city officials attempted to twist the clause written into the settlement into somehow indicating that Maki stated that the city is at no fault in fulfilling his requests for information. Officials used his “well-intentioned” stipulation to make it appear that he had “absolved the city of any wrongdoing,” Maki said in a telephone interview, adding that the city’s interpretation was “factually inaccurate.”

In the city’s initial press release announcing the suit settlement, city officials stated that “Mr. Maki stated that the city’s custodian of records properly fulfilled its obligations and did not violate the Missouri Open Records Act.”

However, that’s not what the settlement actually says. The settlement reads: “WHEREAS, at Mr. Maki’s request, the city acknowledges that the custodian of records for the City of Parkville properly fulfilled her obligations and did not violate the Missouri Open Records Act.”

It is clear by reading the settlement that Maki’s intent was to require that “the city” acknowledge that McChesney properly fulfilled “her” obligations, and not “the city.”

Nowhere in the settlement does it state that “Mr. Maki stated,” or acknowledge, that the city or custodian of records properly fulfilled “its” obligations and did not violate the Missouri Open Records Act.

So that sentence in the city’s news release prompted Maki to write a letter of complaint to city officials and their legal representatives objecting to the claims.

In response the city updated its website stating, “Mr. Maki has expressed a concern about a certain statement in the press release issued by the City of Parkville.” The city included both its original, incorrect statement and also the correct language from the settlement. The city’s release concluded with, “The signed settlement agreement and release speaks for itself.”

City Administrator Joe Parente did not respond to voicemails or calls for comment from a Landmark reporter.

The settlement agreement also includes two stipulations imposed by the city, including that Maki will make no further records requests related to the topics of his initial requests and will not assist others in seeking those topics from the City of Parkville.

The agreement also states each party is responsible for paying their own legal fees.

Both parties have stated settling the case out of court was in the best interest of city taxpayers, who have the responsibility for paying the settlement and legal fees. At last reporting, city officials have said they have paid more than $200,000 for representation in the lawsuit, a figure that will increase as attorney fees continued to be assessed after that date.

Maki has said he had offered to settle for less than the final settlement amount of $195,000, however, that came with the requirement that the city officials would pass an ordinance prohibiting the use of private emails to conduct city business.

Parkville resident Elaine Kellerman said she believes city officials would have accepted the offer if they truly were interested in transparency. In addition, accepting the offer also would have saved money in legal fees.

“It doesn’t speak well of them,” Kellerman said.

In addition, Kellerman said she and other residents are wondering from which funds the money for the legal fees and settlement, which are expected to total nearly $500,000, will come.

“What is the city going to have to forgo (to pay the fees)?,” she asked.

But Kellerman said the settlement agreement may not signal the end of the controversy about the way the city is managed and hopes “a groundswell of dissatisfied folks” act.

“They (city officials) need to make a full accounting of their behavior,” she said, and added: “If anybody believes this is done, they’re mistaken.”

Tags: Lawsuitsparkvilleplatte countySunshine Laws
Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie’s journalism career officially began at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, where she was trained. Her works have appeared in the Kansas City Star and its former Sunday Magazine, the Independence Examiner and TWINS Magazine. Since 2016, Debbie has written for The Landmark, where she has reported on a wide range of Platte County area issues and people.

Related Posts

Persons of interest

Persons of interest still at large

by Landmark Staff
July 5, 2022
0

The Platte County Sheriff's Office says it is continuing its investigation into the shooting death of Taylor Hawkins, 31, which occurred on June 28 in the 28000 block of Oberdiek Lane, in rural Platte County. Hawkins was found shot to...

Fireworks, Greitens, sashes

Fireworks display in Platte City

by Ivan Foley
July 3, 2022
0

There is a fireworks show set in Platte City the night of Monday, July 4. The fireworks display will begin at 10 p.m. at the campus of Platte County R-3 School District along Hwy. 92 in Platte City. There will...

Dunk tank

Downtown Platte City free festival set July 4th

by Ivan Foley
July 3, 2022
0

Free food, games, entertainment from 10-2 Platte City's downtown July 4th Celebration will kick off at 10 a.m. on Monday, July 4. The event will run until 2 p.m. KC Wolf, mascot for the Kansas City Chiefs, will help get...

Parkville Mayor Dean Katerndahl

Landmark Live with Parkville’s new Mayor Dean Katerndahl

by Landmark Digital
July 2, 2022
0

https://youtu.be/Gt4UinmypLI Landmark Publisher Ivan Foley, Parkville's new Mayor Dean Katerndahl, and local musician Brad Carl chat about all things Parkville and other current events. hey everybody welcome in it's landmark live we are back after a long absence i'm ivan...

Next Post
No mask mandate for Platte County

No mask mandate for Platte County

Popular News

  • Mexican restaurant

    Mexican restaurant opens in Briarcliff Village

    95 shares
    Share 38 Tweet 24
  • Fireworks display in Platte City

    23 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • Evergy catching static

    20 shares
    Share 8 Tweet 5
  • Downtown Platte City free festival set July 4th

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Parade, skydiving, fireworks set at Parkville

    17 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 4
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe Online
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem
    • Results by Week
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?