• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Wednesday, February 1, 2023
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

Possibility of destruction of evidence raised

Debbie Coleman-Topi by Debbie Coleman-Topi
January 29, 2021
in Headlines
Destruction of evidence
33
SHARES
824
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

Debate over City of Parkville records continues in court

An attorney representing the city of Parkville in a civil suit told a judge in the case Monday that he would provide certain requested communications between city officials “if that information is there to be provided.”

The disclaimer occurred during a hearing Monday in a case in which Parkville area resident Jason Maki, who is suing the city for allegedly improperly withholding documents he requested under the state’s Sunshine Law, which is aimed at government transparency.

RelatedNews

Parson pledges to widen I-70

Vanover wins Sunshine Law trial

Firearm discoveries at KCI increase by 30 percent

Among other items, Maki has requested the communications between city officials regarding his open records requests, including those present in their private email accounts. The City of Parkville has previously admitted that city officials use their private emails to communicate about public business.

During a late December hearing regarding the city official’s alleged attempts to disobey a court subpoena, Paul Gordon, one of the five attorneys employed by the city, stated that the mayor and alderman had “complied with the subpoenas and produced everything they had.”

Maki disputed Gordon’s claims and produced numerous examples to show otherwise and asked the court to hold the city’s officials in contempt. Gordon responded, “You can’t hold them in contempt for something they don’t have,” implying the communications may have been destroyed.

Maki went on to state that the city officials were obligated to retain correspondences for use in possible future litigation starting when they first became aware of the Missouri Attorney General’s intent to investigate the city in January 2019.

MISSOURI ATTORNEY GENERAL HAD WARNED CITY NOT TO DESTROY POTENTIAL EVIDENCE

Maki told Platte County Judge James Van Amburg during Monday’s hearing that he had become of aware that the Missouri Attorney General’s office had explicitly instructed city officials to refrain from destroying documents or communications regarding Maki’s sunshine requests that could be important during a related attorney general investigation.

In addition, Maki indicated that he had also served the city with a preservation demand which informed the city officials to retain documents and communications for possible use during any future litigation.

At a 2019 Parkville Board of Alderman meeting, City Attorney Chris Williams told board members about the attorney general’s letter, which the city had just received. He said the letter stated city officials should not destroy any documents or communications related to Maki’s Sunshine requests.

Further, Williams said he replied to the attorney general’s office and confirmed that any upcoming destruction of records would not include any of the Sunshine Law documents.

Alderman Brian Whitley suggested either retaining the pertinent records or sending the attorney general’s office a list of which documents would be destroyed in order to get prior approval. But, Alderman Dave Rittman said he favored retaining the documents and Alderman Marc Sportsman said he agreed. Sportsman claimed city staff was under “constant harassment” and “we know exactly how it’s going to be spun by those who are trying to spin it in their way as well as the local newspaper.”

Sportsman continued, “And if we have to go out and spend more money to rent more space for these records, that’s probably what we’ll have to do. The taxpayers, once again, will take the brunt of the harassment.”

The board voted unanimously to retain any records applicable to the Sunshine requests. Despite Maki’s numerous requests, the city has failed to make some documents available, a practice that has continued during the lawsuit.

THE MISSING COMMUNICATIONS MAY BE POTENTIAL EVIDENCE

Maki has made several attempts to retrieve the communications on officials’ private email servers. He earlier served each official with a written subpoena to produce and a “motion to compel” in response to the their failure to produce the documents. When the communications were not produced, he filed a motion asking the judge to find the mayor and aldermen in contempt of court for non-compliance.

Jacob Bielenberg, an attorney representing the city who spoke at the Monday court hearing, said the city already has provided all documents that exist. In a recent court filing, the attorneys for the mayor and aldermen also stated to the court, “plaintiff’s bold assertion is apparently based on the fact he possesses written communications that were not produced. However, this argument is based on an assumption that each of the city officials kept every communication (including email and text) from their private accounts.”

In the December hearing, Maki provided over 10 examples of communications from the mayor and aldermen that should have been produced, but were not. Maki questioned what other records have been withheld or destroyed. The destruction of these communications, while under an apparent duty to preserve them, has become part of the basis for Maki’s request to hold Parkville’s mayor and aldermen in contempt.

The judge has not yet ruled in this matter.

Van Amburg officially has retired his post as a Platte County Circuit Court judge but agreed to hear the remainder of the case following his retirement while serving in senior judge status.

Van Amburg said the next hearing in the case is scheduled for Monday, Feb. 8. He stated that hearing will be one in a long string of hearings to deal with issues in the case. The judge said, “We’ll just keep setting hearings until we get through them.”

Parkville delays plan to destroy public records

Tags: Brian WhitleyDavid RittmanLawsuitsMarc Sportsmanparkvilleplatte countySunshine Laws
Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie’s journalism career officially began at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, where she was trained. Her works have appeared in the Kansas City Star and its former Sunday Magazine, the Independence Examiner and TWINS Magazine. Since 2016, Debbie has written for The Landmark, where she has reported on a wide range of Platte County area issues and people.

Related Posts

45 Years Ago–January 27, 1978

by Ivan Foley
January 27, 2023
0

Miss Grace Ann McLain and Clifford Northern were united in marriage by the Rev. Lester Weeks at the First Christian Church in Platte City on Saturday evening, Jan. 21. The parents of the couple are Mr. and Mrs. Charles McLain...

30 Years Ago–January 23, 1993

by Ivan Foley
January 27, 2023
0

A preliminary budget calling for $7.9 million in general fund expenditures has been presented by Bob Griffith, county auditor and budget officer. General fund revenues for 1993 are expected to be the same as expenditures, $7.9 million. Last years budget...

15 Years Ago–January 23, 2008

by Ivan Foley
January 27, 2023
0

The Landmark exclusively can report a motion to terminate the employment of Keith Moody, longtime city administrator, was approved by a majority of the Platte City Board of Aldermen Tuesday night. The decision to fire Moody was made on a...

Patrick Mahomes

Ankles, schools and column etiquette

by Guy Speckman
January 27, 2023
0

I am “need a space heater at all times” years old. A lot of you are being selfish and not offering your ankles to Patrick Mahomes. You're not using a perfectly good ankle this weekend. Show some pride and make...

Next Post
Parkville City Hall

Alderman has heated exchange with citizen

Popular News

  • Joe Vanover

    Vanover wins Sunshine Law trial

    10 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 3
  • County getting ready to rearrange some chairs

    8 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 2
  • Lawsuit claims toxic heavy metals in herbs and spices

    22 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • Nation’s oldest polar bear dies at KC Zoo

    6 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 2
  • East side Hwy. 92 will become four-lane stretch

    18 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 5
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe Online
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem
    • Login / Sign-up
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved