• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Saturday, March 6, 2021
35 °f
Platte
57 ° Mon
61 ° Tue
63 ° Wed
54 ° Thu
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

Hearing set Aug. 7 in Sunshine lawsuit

Debbie Coleman-Topi by Debbie Coleman-Topi
July 24, 2020
in Parkville, Platte County
Parkville City Hall
8
SHARES
203
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

In Maki’s case against City of Parkville

A Parkville area resident and city officials continue to be locked in a standoff in a civil suit over the city’s refusal to release documents the citizen deems public under the state’s Sunshine Law.

The lawsuit, filed by Jason Maki, who leads a citizens group critical of the way the city is managed, is seeking the release of communications by city officials using their private servers. The two parties are marching ever nearer toward a Friday, Aug. 7 court date in response to the parties’ ongoing dispute, where Maki is asking the court to order the documents released and city officials are arguing specific answers could place the city’s computer system in jeopardy.

RelatedNews

Republican women to meet via Zoom

Contractor chosen for new Buck O’Neil Bridge

Health department gets much less than requested

In addition, Maki, who leads Citizens for a Better Parkville, also asks the court to “impose other such sanctions, if any, as the court finds appropriate; and grant any other relief the court deems just and proper.”

The suit, filed Feb. 27 in Platte County Circuit Court, accuses the city of eight Sunshine Law violations and asks the city to produce private email and other such correspondence on private servers pertaining to Maki’s Sunshine requests submitted between September 2018 and the present.

In the latest court filings, Maki’s suit states that the “Plaintiff requested public records and paid the City’s requested fee.” But city officials did not comply. However, the city’s response cites state case law in which “Missouri courts have held while parties can discover information and documents relevant to a case, discovery is not meant for ‘untrammeled use of a factual dragnet or fishing expedition.’

“The city’s response claims the subject manner is overly broad and urges the court to “consider whether the information may be obtained in a less burdensome manner than that designed by the requesting party.”

Maki’s response counters that the city is “knowingly and willfully” violating the law, which is intended to safeguard transparency in government.

“In response to the city’s failures to answer and evasive discovery tactics, the Court should order that the City answer the interrogatories and, absent compliance, strike the City’s Answer and enter default judgement in Plaintiff’s favor.”

In a May 7 telephone conversation, the two parties discussed their differing views and Maki suggested he was prepared to “move to compel” if production of the records was further delayed to which the lead attorney for the city closed the conversation by referring to Maki as “an asshole,” according to court documents.

In response to Maki’s request that the city provide their process for handling Sunshine requests, the city stated officials “conduct searches of their files and e-mails for documents responsive to the request. In addition, depending on the request, search terms may be provided to the city’s outside IT (Information Technology) consultant to perform an electronic search.they are reviewed by city staff to determine whether they are responsive to the request and whether they are closed records under the Sunshine Law.”

The city’s statement continues that the search is conducted only after estimated payment is received. Maki claims he has paid several thousand dollars in fees, which is more than allowed by law.

The city’s response continues that “Mr. Maki’s interrogatories did not properly address the details he was looking for.” However, Maki’s documents reflect his belief that the city’s responses contain only “partial answers.” In asking for further details about the city’s management of such requests, the city objected to answering and asked Maki to issue a re-worded “interrogatory” and, after giving city officials a deadline, information was not released by the specified date, according to the documents.

In addition, the city’s general objection to Maki’s request is unlawful. “General objections are ineffective under Missouri law and should be overruled,” according to the document. “Plaintiff certifies that he has attempted to discuss the matter with opposing counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the disputed issues.”

Maki’s documents further claim the city failed to address the question and “provided a generalized boilerplate response to a specific question.” and “does not include any procedural steps” but instead includes “generalities that could be guessed at by any layperson.”

Maki claims city officials are capable of providing detailed explanations for various procedures as they did when challenged by Missouri Attorney General in which they provided an 11-page nearly 5,000-word response as to why the statewide office should not investigate the city for Sunshine violations, compared with the city’s approximately 200-word response to Maki’s Sunshine procedure request. Therefore, Maki’s court document states that the city only possesses a ‘general’ process for compliance with the open records laws and instead processes each request by ‘winging-it.’

Tags: Lawsuitsparkvilleplatte countySunshine Laws
Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie's journalism career began at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, where she was trained.

Her works have appeared in The Kansas City Star and its Sunday magazine, The (Independence) Examiner and TWINS Magazine. Debbie has written for The Landmark for the past four years where she has reported on a wide range of Platte County area issues and people.

These include the longest-running issue of her three-decade career--a massive development in Parkville, which spawned a citizens' movement that objects to the way city officials manage the city.

She is the author of "TWINformation: The Biology, Psychology and Development of Twins”, written in response to having and raising fraternal male twins (she and her husband later welcomed a girl to the family.)

She is also the author of “Memories of A War Bride,” which chronicles the life of her husband's Godmother, a WWII English war bride.

Debbie and her husband, John, live in Blue Springs, a long car drive from events and meetings she covers for The Landmark. In fact, when she first met publisher Ivan Foley, after answering his ad for a reporter she told him she should have packed a lunch for the long journey. When she heard no response following the job interview, Debbie called to ask if Foley was not interested in her joining the staff. He was interested, but assumed the drive was too long.

Obviously, he was wrong.

Related Posts

Platte Landing boat ramp described as ‘dangerous’

Platte Landing boat ramp described as ‘dangerous’

by Ivan Foley
March 4, 2021
0

In January of 2017 it is alleged Toni Anderson, age 20, a college student from Wichita who had been living and working in Kansas City, was driving her car when she got disoriented and ended up in the Platte Landing...

Joe Vanover

County commissioner wants to be associate circuit judge

by Ivan Foley
March 4, 2021
0

When Ann Hansbrough was recently appointed to fill the circuit judge post vacated by the retiring James Van Amburg, it created a vacancy in Hansbrough's former spot of associate circuit judge. The process to name the new associate circuit judge...

Government transparency

Lack of transparency at the health department

by Landmark Digital Staff
March 4, 2021
0

EDITOR: Something shady went down at the Platte County Health Department and it deserves to be investigated. Local dentist and board of trustees member, Teresa Hills, sold her dental practice and left Platte County on Jan. 1, 2021 requiring that...

Petticoat Junction

Commissioners, judgeships and Petticoat Junction

by Ivan Foley
March 4, 2021
0

Eight folks have applied to become associate circuit judge in Platte County. The chosen one will fill the spot vacated when Judge Ann Hansbrough was recently named to circuit judge, leaving her associate judgeship to be filled by a process...

Next Post
Platte County Taxpayer

List of businesses applying for county grant money (mobile friendly)

Popular News

  • Platte Landing boat ramp described as ‘dangerous’

    Platte Landing boat ramp described as ‘dangerous’

    86 shares
    Share 34 Tweet 22
  • Why the urgency for R-3 bond issue?

    29 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 7
  • Judge tells city to produce documents

    23 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • County commissioner wants to be associate circuit judge

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • City ‘finds’ 2,300 records, gives them to Jason Maki

    17 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 4
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Subscribe Online
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist