• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Sunday, January 29, 2023
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

Hearing set Aug. 7 in Sunshine lawsuit

Debbie Coleman-Topi by Debbie Coleman-Topi
July 24, 2020
in Parkville, Platte County
Parkville City Hall
10
SHARES
239
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

In Maki’s case against City of Parkville

A Parkville area resident and city officials continue to be locked in a standoff in a civil suit over the city’s refusal to release documents the citizen deems public under the state’s Sunshine Law.

The lawsuit, filed by Jason Maki, who leads a citizens group critical of the way the city is managed, is seeking the release of communications by city officials using their private servers. The two parties are marching ever nearer toward a Friday, Aug. 7 court date in response to the parties’ ongoing dispute, where Maki is asking the court to order the documents released and city officials are arguing specific answers could place the city’s computer system in jeopardy.

RelatedNews

Are you up for Immersive Yoga?

Let the gourd times roll

Gibson awarded as best
assistant prosecutor in state

In addition, Maki, who leads Citizens for a Better Parkville, also asks the court to “impose other such sanctions, if any, as the court finds appropriate; and grant any other relief the court deems just and proper.”

The suit, filed Feb. 27 in Platte County Circuit Court, accuses the city of eight Sunshine Law violations and asks the city to produce private email and other such correspondence on private servers pertaining to Maki’s Sunshine requests submitted between September 2018 and the present.

In the latest court filings, Maki’s suit states that the “Plaintiff requested public records and paid the City’s requested fee.” But city officials did not comply. However, the city’s response cites state case law in which “Missouri courts have held while parties can discover information and documents relevant to a case, discovery is not meant for ‘untrammeled use of a factual dragnet or fishing expedition.’

“The city’s response claims the subject manner is overly broad and urges the court to “consider whether the information may be obtained in a less burdensome manner than that designed by the requesting party.”

Maki’s response counters that the city is “knowingly and willfully” violating the law, which is intended to safeguard transparency in government.

“In response to the city’s failures to answer and evasive discovery tactics, the Court should order that the City answer the interrogatories and, absent compliance, strike the City’s Answer and enter default judgement in Plaintiff’s favor.”

In a May 7 telephone conversation, the two parties discussed their differing views and Maki suggested he was prepared to “move to compel” if production of the records was further delayed to which the lead attorney for the city closed the conversation by referring to Maki as “an asshole,” according to court documents.

In response to Maki’s request that the city provide their process for handling Sunshine requests, the city stated officials “conduct searches of their files and e-mails for documents responsive to the request. In addition, depending on the request, search terms may be provided to the city’s outside IT (Information Technology) consultant to perform an electronic search.they are reviewed by city staff to determine whether they are responsive to the request and whether they are closed records under the Sunshine Law.”

The city’s statement continues that the search is conducted only after estimated payment is received. Maki claims he has paid several thousand dollars in fees, which is more than allowed by law.

The city’s response continues that “Mr. Maki’s interrogatories did not properly address the details he was looking for.” However, Maki’s documents reflect his belief that the city’s responses contain only “partial answers.” In asking for further details about the city’s management of such requests, the city objected to answering and asked Maki to issue a re-worded “interrogatory” and, after giving city officials a deadline, information was not released by the specified date, according to the documents.

In addition, the city’s general objection to Maki’s request is unlawful. “General objections are ineffective under Missouri law and should be overruled,” according to the document. “Plaintiff certifies that he has attempted to discuss the matter with opposing counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the disputed issues.”

Maki’s documents further claim the city failed to address the question and “provided a generalized boilerplate response to a specific question.” and “does not include any procedural steps” but instead includes “generalities that could be guessed at by any layperson.”

Maki claims city officials are capable of providing detailed explanations for various procedures as they did when challenged by Missouri Attorney General in which they provided an 11-page nearly 5,000-word response as to why the statewide office should not investigate the city for Sunshine violations, compared with the city’s approximately 200-word response to Maki’s Sunshine procedure request. Therefore, Maki’s court document states that the city only possesses a ‘general’ process for compliance with the open records laws and instead processes each request by ‘winging-it.’

Tags: Lawsuitsparkvilleplatte countySunshine Laws
Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie Coleman-Topi

Debbie’s journalism career officially began at the University of Missouri School of Journalism, where she was trained. Her works have appeared in the Kansas City Star and its former Sunday Magazine, the Independence Examiner and TWINS Magazine. Since 2016, Debbie has written for The Landmark, where she has reported on a wide range of Platte County area issues and people.

Related Posts

45 Years Ago–January 27, 1978

by Ivan Foley
January 27, 2023
0

Miss Grace Ann McLain and Clifford Northern were united in marriage by the Rev. Lester Weeks at the First Christian Church in Platte City on Saturday evening, Jan. 21. The parents of the couple are Mr. and Mrs. Charles McLain...

30 Years Ago–January 23, 1993

by Ivan Foley
January 27, 2023
0

A preliminary budget calling for $7.9 million in general fund expenditures has been presented by Bob Griffith, county auditor and budget officer. General fund revenues for 1993 are expected to be the same as expenditures, $7.9 million. Last years budget...

15 Years Ago–January 23, 2008

by Ivan Foley
January 27, 2023
0

The Landmark exclusively can report a motion to terminate the employment of Keith Moody, longtime city administrator, was approved by a majority of the Platte City Board of Aldermen Tuesday night. The decision to fire Moody was made on a...

Patrick Mahomes

Ankles, schools and column etiquette

by Guy Speckman
January 27, 2023
0

I am “need a space heater at all times” years old. A lot of you are being selfish and not offering your ankles to Patrick Mahomes. You're not using a perfectly good ankle this weekend. Show some pride and make...

Next Post
Platte County Taxpayer

List of businesses applying for county grant money (mobile friendly)

Popular News

  • East side Hwy. 92 will become four-lane stretch

    East side Hwy. 92 will become four-lane stretch

    17 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 4
  • Lawsuit claims toxic heavy metals in herbs and spices

    21 shares
    Share 8 Tweet 5
  • Southbound U.S. 169 to close for bridge project

    10 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 3
  • County getting ready to rearrange some chairs

    7 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 2
  • Nation’s oldest polar bear dies at KC Zoo

    6 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 2
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe Online
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem
    • Login / Sign-up
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved