Corte Suprema, descuento para personas mayores, repetición del impuesto sobre el uso

El empleado de una tienda me preguntó la semana pasada si calificaba para el descuento para "personas mayores". Le respondí con un rápido “no” y en silencio cuestioné la necesidad de la joven de hacerse un examen de la vista. Triste que los jóvenes no estén recibiendo la atención médica que necesitan.


As I was leaving, it dawned on me that I might start taking the discount, even if I obviously don’t qualify. Do they check you on that, or just trust old people? I’ve never been old before and just now learning the ropes. Thanks in advance for your help.


When I was 17-years-old, I had a poorly-done fake ID that indicated I was 22 that I utilized to buy beer at the Ectonville convenience store on Hwy. 92. Do I need to get a fake that says I’m 65? Anyone know a guy?


Do people have “a guy” anymore, or do you just get on the internet for illegal stuff now? I’m going to have to sharpen my game to fully max out on this senior discount thing.


Según entiendo el proceso, una comisión de abogados y ciudadanos selectos llevará a cabo entrevistas del 21 al 23 de agosto en el edificio de la Corte Suprema en Jefferson City, donde seleccionará a sus tres nominados para que el gobernador los considere al nombrar un nuevo juez de la Corte Suprema de Missouri. . La jueza Megan Benton y el equipo Tony Luetkemeyer son los locales que competirán entre las 23 personas entrevistadas.
Una “comisión de abogados” suena especialmente dolorosa, pero supongo que sin dolor, no hay ganancia si quieres sentarte en la Corte Suprema de Missouri. Muchas leyes de aborto para eliminar en cada sesión y demás, por lo que debe estar en forma judicial desde el primer día.
I’m mostly worried about Truman Luetkemeyer, the senator’s dog that is a steady presence in his Senate office. Can Truman hang out at the Supreme Court building? Is it legal for him to sit in on briefs and consults with staff writing opinion? Can canines be a threat to democracy, or no? These are the things that worry me at night.
The interviews are open to the public if you enjoy listening to lawyers interview lawyers. I’d take some icepicks for your ears if you plan to attend.


I think Parkville running the use tax right back at their citizenry is a bad look. Spending the taxpayer’s money to have them keep telling the city officials no is not a good look. I’ve sat in on more than my share of city council meetings over the years, and it is always the same. They just can’t believe the tax didn’t pass and “maybe they didn’t understand it” and then they run it back up the same pole and get just a few more supporters to the polls. I have no dog in the fight, but I always smile a little when taxpayers keep kicking these things right back at the officials that “can’t believe” it didn’t pass. It is sad that those same taxpayers are paying the bill to tell them the same thing they told them last April.
Don’t email me the merits of the tax. I have previously written that the use tax made more sense than the sales tax that did pass in April. I’m not against the merits of the tax, I’m just a proponent of actually listening to the voters.

(No se puede contactar a Guy Speckman. Está acampando en la Corte Suprema de Missouri para conseguir un buen asiento para las entrevistas de abogados)

Salir de la versión móvil