• About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Friday, May 9, 2025
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem!
    • Weekly Pickem Updates
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish
No Result
View All Result
The Platte County Landmark Newspaper
No Result
View All Result

It’s reassessment time again

Landmark Digital by Landmark Digital
January 27, 2023
in Letters to the Editor
Dueling reassessment letters
4
SHARES
110
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email

EDITOR:

It’s reassessment time again and the price trend for home sales and used vehicles is headed lower. I doubt the next round of assessments will have the same money grab fervor as 2019 and 2021.

RelatedNews

Something is wrong in Park Hill School District

Sam, it was Biden’s work, not Trump’s

Voters, how do we make you care?

The assessor routinely over assesses property without any supporting evidence. This arbitrary practice puts the burden of proof on the homeowner to submit to a home search to disprove the over assessment. The homeowner can refuse the search but then must pay the over assessment as a penalty. Due to the Fourth Amendment, the assessor can’t enter your home unless you give them voluntary permission, but due to the penalty it’s not voluntary.

The way this works is even if you have had your home searched and photographed in the past, something like a finished basement, at least a $10,000 over assessment, is put back on your assessment as a routine default every few years. Very few fight the over assessment because the entire process is designed to intimidate you into ether accepting the over assessment or giving up your Fourth Amendment rights.

Currently only if the reassessment is over 15% is the assessor’s office required to do a physical inspection. It’s really no cap or protection at all for the homeowner because if they don’t have the manpower, they will assess many at 14.9%, as was done in Jackson County.

At the very least, for any increase in assessment the burden of proof needs to be put on the assessor. The assessor must have probable cause before requiring to enter your home as guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.

Since the homeowner is funding the appeal process and many don’t have the expertise or the money to hire representation, when they appeal they should be provided an advocate, one of the many standing against you from the assessors office.

This unconstitutional, bad faith practice will continue until someone takes it to the Missouri State Supreme Court, or enough voters contact Senator Luetkemeyer to change it. Contact your representative and tell him to put the burden of proof on the assessor.

Contact information for State Sen. Luetkemeyer is:
Senator Tony Luetkemeyer, 201 W. Capitol Ave., Rm. 430, Jefferson City, Missouri 65101, phone 573-751-2183

             --Dr. Tim Altenburg, DDS
               Platte County
Tags: platte county
Landmark Digital

Landmark Digital

Related Posts

45 Years Ago–May 2, 1980

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Mr. and Mrs. Don R. Bailey of Independence announce the upcoming marriage of their daughter, Cathy Jean, to James Franklin Anderson, son of Lt. Col and Mrs. F.B. Anderson of Ferrelview. The ceremony will commence Saturday, May 24 at the...

30 Years Ago–May 4, 1995

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Between the Lines by Ivan Foley: Major League Baseball is back after the strike, but fans across the country thus far have given it a cool reception. In Kansas City, the Royals couldn’t even give away all 5,000 of the...

15 Years Ago–May 5, 2010

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

If you thought the proposed Tomahawke housing development had disappeared from the news cycle, think again. Chris Byrd, attorney for landowners/developers Hal and Peggy Swaney, told The Landmark on Tuesday that the developers will be filing to appeal a judge’s...

Back to the movies

Catechism, burglary vs. robbery, The Accountant 2

by Ivan Foley
May 1, 2025
0

Guy Speckman, our Ponder the Thought columnist on page 3, has inspiring, amusing and educational thoughts on Catholicism and whatnot in his column this week, including a detailed explanation of how a new Pope is chosen. I want to say...

Next Post
Patrick Mahomes

Ankles, schools and column etiquette

Popular News

  • Northland Workforce Development Center

    KC commits $25 million to new workforce center

    18 shares
    Share 7 Tweet 5
  • Five businesses hit in series of break-ins

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Sheriff’s department provides statement on officer-involved shooting

    22 shares
    Share 9 Tweet 6
  • The Landmark begins its 161st year of publication

    6 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 2
  • Catechism, burglary vs. robbery, The Accountant 2

    6 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 2
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Pickem Terms and Conditions
Call us at 816-858-0363

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe Online
  • Home
  • Local News
  • Opinion
  • Landmark Pickem
    • Results by Week
    • The Leaderboard
    • Pickem Rules and Help
  • Landmark Live!
  • Looking Backward
  • es_MXSpanish

Copyright © 2019-2020 The Platte County Landmark Newspaper - All Rights Reserved